Larken outrightly states that he debunks flat earth in a video found at <a href="https://odysee.com/@KeithKnightDontTreadOnAnyone" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://odysee.com/@KeithKnightDontTreadOnAnyone</a>:b/The-Earth-is-Flat---REBUTTED!-by-Larken-Rose:a<br /><br />These are the notes I wrote whilst listening to it. I personally believe he fails to give solid evidence whilst he repeatedly uses fallacies and insults to get his view at times. He fall foul to the things he accuses flat earthers of. He is very forthright in his performance, but does his evidence properly furnish such gusto? Or is he merely mainly using a begging the question fallacy, already assuming globe earth to be true? I'm just sharing my thoughts.<br /><br />For a video dealing with Larken's posturing, see <a href="https://odysee.com/@TheDarkAbsorbsMe" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://odysee.com/@TheDarkAbsorbsMe</a>:2/larken-rose-fails-to-debunk-flat-earth:9