What I am going to show you the PCR is not a test and the virus has never been isolated. The Nobel Prize inventor of the PCR, Kary Mullis clearly states in the first video that you can use the PCR to find nearly anything that you want. Again, and as you will see in his own words, it is not a test. Sadly and oddly Kary died on Aug 7th, 2019. One can clearly speculate that Mullis would be against how the PCR is being used. It is to be used as a process for analyzing DNA with the full name being Polymerase Chain Reaction or PCR.<br /> <br />You will see in this second video Kary Mullis talking about Dr. Fauci who he calls a fraud. Dr. Fauci is the main doctor in the United States that has been pushing for lockdowns and vaccines. Fauci is also behind much of the research and clouded details surrounding HIV and AIDS. Kary talked about and wrote on his own website that he did not fully believe the HIV hypothesis. This background information and relationship to the HIV scam is important. There are many similarities to how billions of funds have been wasted on HIV research and how the same is being done with COVID. After decades of research, where is the HIV vaccine? The next logical question is how did they come up with multiple COVID vaccines so quickly? Let’s watch the video and see Kary clearly call out Fauci.<br /> <br /><a href="https://www.karymullis.com/pdf/On_AIDS_and_Global_Warming.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www.karymullis.com/pdf/On_AIDS_and_Global_Warming.pdf</a><br /> <br />AIDS and GLOBAL WARMING<br />These issues are complex and not to be resolved by a paragraph. Anyone truly interested in either should be willing to dig hard into the scientific literature of the last 20 years, realizing that most of it is uninformative, but it is all we’ve got. Climatologists have recently adopted their own language, which resembles English heavily laced with far too many ad hoc acronyms, which makes the reader immediately suspicious. The AIDS literature has generally avoided important issues in favor of endless inconsequential details.<br /> <br />A nice place to start on this mess of big issues, in a general way, is a very readable book by Daniel Gardner called The Science of Fear. This book is fascinating and reminds us of a few of the ways we come to believe, or not to believe, in important postulates. You might call it pop psychology; I think it is Mass Psychology 101.<br /> <br />On AIDS<br />Regarding AIDS I have published a hypothesis wherein the Retroviridae in general, rather than a particular species, is the problem. This was published in Genetica 95:195-197, 1995. It offers a mechanism for how the disease develops, and importantly makes predictions that can be experimentally confirmed or falsified easily in rodents. This hypothesis may or may not be true but it illustrates the nature of a useful scientific hypothesis. This is in contrast to the current AIDS establishment’s “It’s the virus, stupid!” No experiments were ever done or even suggested to test the HIV hypothesis.<br /> <br />The fact that antiretroviral therapies may prolong the lives of some people infected with retroviruses says nothing more than the fact, that in other cases they are not at all useful. Something is going on here that we don’t understand. Scientists have to keep that in mind.<br /> <br />Global Warming<br />It should be understood by anyone professing an interest in climatology that the object of study has been around longer than man and the climate here has varied radically in the last 40 million years. In the Eocene carbon dioxide levels were several times higher than they are currently. The temperature was quite compatible with life from pole to pole.<br /> <br />Until we can understand that, or how Earth moved from there to the Miocene, then the Pliocene and then the Holocene, each with its own climate, flora and fauna, we have no good reason to think we understand climate. To make predictions about what follows from here and when, and to audaciously begin the discussion by implicating our humble species in the whole thing is worse than audacious, it’s pathetic.