LBRY Block Explorer

LBRY Claims • spars-pandemic-scenario

43a3baac10f13e4d81937d01c2f7fd3fba5de020

Published By
Anonymous
Created On
14 Apr 2021 15:40:19 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
2017 Document SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028
<a href="https://libredd.it/r/NoNewNormal/comments/mk00kt/2017_document_for_future_spars_pandemic_scenario/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://libredd.it/r/NoNewNormal/comments/mk00kt/2017_document_for_future_spars_pandemic_scenario/</a><br /><br />Page 14<br /><br />Mild cases of the disease, which produced symptoms including cough, fever, headaches, and malaise, were often perceived as the flu by the people who had them and consequently often went untreated and undiagnosed by medical personnel. As a result, early case fatality estimates were inflated. By late November, the CDC reported an initial estimated SPARS case fatality rate of 4.7% (By contrast, WHO reported that the overall case fatality rate for SARS was 14-15% and over 50% for people over the age of 64. Later in the SPARS outbreak, data that included more accurate estimates of mild SPARS cases indicated a case fatality rate of only 0.6%).<br /><br />Two additional features of the SPARS virus that were not appreciated at the beginning of the pandemic, but that impacted how the outbreak played out, are also important to consider in a review of this event. First, the virus had an extended incubation period (seven to ten days) compared to its latent period (four to five days). Thus, infected persons could spread the virus for up to nearly a week before showing symptoms of the disease themselves.<br /><br />Page 66<br /><br />As the pandemic tapered off, several influential politicians and agency representatives came under fire for sensationalizing the severity of the event for perceived political gain. As with many public health interventions, successful efforts to reduce the impact of the pandemic created the illusion that the event was not nearly as serious as experts suggested it would be. President Archer’s detractors in the Republican Party seized the opportunity to publicly disparage the President and his administration’s response to the pandemic, urging voters to elect “a strong leader with the best interests of the American people at heart.” A widespread social media movement led primarily by outspoken parents of affect
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
application/pdf
Language
English
Open in LBRY