22 July 2025<br /><br />This lecture explores the is-ought dichotomy, analyzing David Hume's assertion that moral imperatives cannot be directly derived from factual statements. The speaker critiques the selective use of this principle in secular morality and legal contexts, arguing that moral judgments often reflect subjective views rather than objective truths. The discussion emphasizes that engagements in debate carry intrinsic ethical standards, suggesting that while strict derivation may be problematic, a shared understanding of moral imperatives can emerge within secular discourse, enriching the conversation around ethics.<br /><br />FOLLOW ME ON X! <a href="https://x.com/StefanMolyneux" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://x.com/StefanMolyneux</a><br /><br />GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!<br /><a href="https://peacefulparenting.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://peacefulparenting.com/</a><br /><br />Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!<br /><br />Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows!<br /><br />You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!<br /><br />See you soon!<br /><a href="https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025</a>