1. I don't think you're hands aren't doing it to trick yourself, but you may be tricking yourself in another way, but then the definition of yourself comes into focus.<br /><br />2. Why are there such alleged polarised 'views' (aka brainwashed acceptable non-opinions) touted. Creationist, Bible Believer, or, Chimpanzee Swing non-Charles Darwin, 'Darwinist Evolutionist' (Eugenics)-idiots?<br /><br />Neither's scientifically possible, let alone provable, so why are all primary school children ordered that they are facts?<br /><br />Then there's the scientific method, which also links in, for whom we have to thank Rupert Sheldrake, who can put in perspective from a wide range of worked through theories, reverse engineered from actual real-life experiments and phenomenon, which are well accepted as reality.<br /><br />This is the Hegelian Dialectic in play, so as that's being used, as per the biggest stick of the overlord, there must be something important in play, which is why these two flawed concepts are being pushed; I say flawed as Evolutionism is pure nonsense, but the ongoing perpetuation of things associated with Adam and Eve is no accident, as it is very close to the truth, and indeed, I believe, is a cover for or euphamism of what really lies beneath the sillyhead speculation, whilst shrouded in sillyhead cover, that it may never be taken seriously by the mass, unless they are actually believing it in reality, thus even worse than Darwinianists.<br /><br />Please let me know what you think.<br />...<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1ZSUst4jEY" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1ZSUst4jEY</a>